<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blinded By The Light</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/</link>
	<description>Jeff Singer, San Francisco Editorial &#38; Commercial Photographer BLOG</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:01:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Reitz</title>
		<link>http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/comment-page-1/#comment-4903</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Reitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/#comment-4903</guid>
		<description>&quot;This is a great post. Thank you for putting this post out there for all of us. 

Thanks!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is a great post. Thank you for putting this post out there for all of us. </p>
<p>Thanks!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Singer</title>
		<link>http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/comment-page-1/#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/#comment-1626</guid>
		<description>Derek,

Only the first shot would have possibly caused the problem... but even then it may not have happened.  The light source needs to be in the shot for it to happen.

Thanks,
Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek,</p>
<p>Only the first shot would have possibly caused the problem&#8230; but even then it may not have happened.  The light source needs to be in the shot for it to happen.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek shapton</title>
		<link>http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/comment-page-1/#comment-1623</link>
		<dc:creator>derek shapton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/#comment-1623</guid>
		<description>hi jeff

I&#039;ve been working with a p45+ for a while now and have had none of the problems you describe. Nice clean backlit scenes, with any visible artifacts attributable to the lenses rather than the back. Some examples can be seen at:

http://www.derekshapton.com/recent.html

the first 5 shots were with the p45+ -- the first 2 are significantly backlit.

Derek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi jeff</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been working with a p45+ for a while now and have had none of the problems you describe. Nice clean backlit scenes, with any visible artifacts attributable to the lenses rather than the back. Some examples can be seen at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.derekshapton.com/recent.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.derekshapton.com/recent.html</a></p>
<p>the first 5 shots were with the p45+ &#8212; the first 2 are significantly backlit.</p>
<p>Derek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kraus</title>
		<link>http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/comment-page-1/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kraus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>No such problem seen with my P30+. Both with sun in frame, as well as sun peeking out from behind trees, etc, no vertical lines such as yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No such problem seen with my P30+. Both with sun in frame, as well as sun peeking out from behind trees, etc, no vertical lines such as yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sherratt</title>
		<link>http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/comment-page-1/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sherratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff,
i recently bought a second hand p30, so i thought i would test it out to see if it had the issue, and after a few shots out of my bedroom window got exactly the same problem (pic is here if you want to see it http://www.marksherratt.com/clients/test/CF018226.jpg). But my eos 5d seemed to handle the light no problem. Not great for something so expensive! Anyway would be interested if you get to test out a leaf.

Mark.

P.S. congrats on getting nominated for the APE photo consultation demo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,<br />
i recently bought a second hand p30, so i thought i would test it out to see if it had the issue, and after a few shots out of my bedroom window got exactly the same problem (pic is here if you want to see it <a href="http://www.marksherratt.com/clients/test/CF018226.jpg)" rel="nofollow">http://www.marksherratt.com/clients/test/CF018226.jpg)</a>. But my eos 5d seemed to handle the light no problem. Not great for something so expensive! Anyway would be interested if you get to test out a leaf.</p>
<p>Mark.</p>
<p>P.S. congrats on getting nominated for the APE photo consultation demo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Singer</title>
		<link>http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/comment-page-1/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>I think the P45+ would have the same issue since it has the same sensor as the P25+.  The P30+ is a different sensor, so it may not have the issue.  However, I was never interested in the P30+ because of the crop factor.  I want a sensor that is as close to full frame as possible.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the P45+ would have the same issue since it has the same sensor as the P25+.  The P30+ is a different sensor, so it may not have the issue.  However, I was never interested in the P30+ because of the crop factor.  I want a sensor that is as close to full frame as possible.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffsingerphotography.com/blog/2008/01/20/blinded-by-the-light/#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I suggest scheduling a demo with the Phase One Dealer from whom you purchased the Digital Back and check out the P30/+ or P45/+. These backs have smaller pixel wells which handle the overload of analog light it a better fashion. Run a comparison test and let us know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I suggest scheduling a demo with the Phase One Dealer from whom you purchased the Digital Back and check out the P30/+ or P45/+. These backs have smaller pixel wells which handle the overload of analog light it a better fashion. Run a comparison test and let us know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
